English -speaking critics not so long ago smashed to fluff "Infinity" – The new work of the talented Antoine Fukua, in whose account "Training day" , "Shooter" And "Leftha". Now the fantastic action movie has humiliating 16% on "tomatoes". However, as folk wisdom says, only one who does nothing is mistaken. We decided to recall the most failure paintings of ten respected and popular directors. The louder the failure, the higher the place.
10th place – "Dune" David Lynch
David Lynch, some fans call the king of surrealism, but this is rather a simplification, because along with puzzles like "Malholland Drive" And "Highway to nowhere" In his filmography there are quite mainstream "Wild heart" , sentimental "Man-Slon" And "Simple History" , which justifies its name. Only blockbusters do not remove the linch. Although he tried once, so much so that he still recalls with regret.
The film adaptation of the Dun spacecraft Frank Herbert was entrusted to the director shortly after the success of the same “man-man”. Initially, Ridley Scott was supposed to be engaged in the project, but after a year the development he went to do "Running blade". Lynch with Roman Herbert was not a sign, and indeed he was not interested in science fiction, but he approached the case with all responsibility. As a result of long, large -scale and painful filming in Mexico, it turned out to be a four -hour epic, quite accurately the next plot of the original book. But here it turned out that he does not need a studio – she needs it "Star wars". So David Lynch took the right to final installation and reduced the picture by half. And he in response asked to remove his name from the credits.
Frankly, "Dune" Not that bad. Over the past decades, she even acquired an army of fans. The most stubborn of them literally in pieces collected a three -hour version of the film. And, I must admit, it is much easier for perception than what was released in the distant 1984. That “dune” is incoherent, tightened, overloaded with characters and plot lines. From the Universe, invented by Frank Herbert, this film is more able to scare away than to encourage it to explore. It is not surprising that David Lynch even after 37 years does not want to talk about the picture.
9th place – "Oz: the Great and Terrible" Sam Reimi
Sam Raymy took off not one, but two great trilogies at once: "Empterian dead" And "Spider-Man". The rest of his films are not so influential, but still loved at least as fans of the director – be it Zalihvitsky Western "Fast and dead" , Gloomy superhero "Man of darkness" or metaphorical horror "Take me to hell". But one experiment Raymy was unsuccessful. Almost ten years ago, the director tried to make his brightest, most family and most fabulous film. As he said, more Disney than Disney himself. So appeared "OZ: Great and terrible" – prequel truly legendary picture of 1939.
To encroach on the golden classics of Hollywood – the undertaking, in principle, doubtful. Raymy would probably be torn to pieces, even if he did everything. But he did not succeed. “Oz” was quite rightly scolded for a primitive script, too simple for a fairy tale, a plastic picture, not enough charming James Franco and Mila Kunis, absolutely not suitable for the role of a future evil witch. In the film you can find a couple of successful and atmospheric scenes, but it seems that it is in those episodes when Raimie forgot about his intention to make children's cinema and out of habit invented something terrible. Otherwise, “Lake: Great and terrible” – perhaps the most soulless and passing film in the director's career.
8th place – "gloomy shadows" of Tim Burton
It is difficult to find a director more faithful to yourself than Tim Burton. Whatever he shoots, it turns out a film about an outsider who is trying to change the world around him. This story can be bright and inspiring as "Large fish" , lyrical, how "Edward Hands-Nozdnitsa" , gloomy and bloody like "Swinnie Todd". And it can also be ridiculous and vulgar like "Gloomy shadows".
As always, Burton undertook to transfer to the big screen what he himself liked so much. In the case of "gloomy shadows" this is a Gothic soap opera of the sixties. However, instead of a romantic horror, for some reason he took off his "Addams family". And for health – many fans have long been asked about it. The trouble is that it turned out catastrophically not funny and somehow lifeless, despite all the grimaces of Johnny Depp, Eve Green and Helena Bonya Carter. As if Burton were terribly burned out by the time of filming and instead of truly creating, he simply imitated himself. Maybe so it was. After all, the next film is, "Big eyes" , just talked about the artist who was forced to draw the same.
7th place – "hemini" Eng
Enga Lee has enough merits: after all, there are three Oscars on his hands. The first for "The stealing tiger hidden dragon" , that the new life in Chinese fantasy Usya inhaled. The second is for "Gorbaty Mountain" , which can squeeze a tear even from the most ardent homophobes. Well, the third – for amazingly beautiful and inspiring "Life Pi". Of course there is still ambiguous "Hulk" , But even he has defenders. But on "Gemini" most began to https://god-odds-casino.co.uk/ give a damn right after the release.
The fighter about the battle of Killer and the young clone tried to remove themselves from the end of the nineties. This is probably why it is felt so outdated – not old, but outdated. The relatively fresh idea of "hemini" is stocked with the most oak -up performance. Will Smith plays two different characters at once, but they are both equally boring. The old mercenary only loses its grip in words, but in fact it remains perfect imboe, and his young opponent is the initially good guy who will inevitably go over to the side of the hero. There is not even an attempt to outplay the eternal cliche. Fighting scenes are dynamic and fascinating, but the rest of the time hemini is an exceptionally sad sight, which spoils both the track record of Engl Lee and the filmography of Willa Smith.
6th place – "Ghosts of Mars" John Carpenter
John Carpenter should stand on a par with Ridley Scott, James Cameron and Stephen Spielberg. His Halloween , "Escape from New York" And "Something" not only became cult, but also influenced the development of entire genres of cinema. But there is still "Big commotion in small China" , "Aliens among us" , "In the mouth of madness" And also a dozen excellent paintings. But the director’s career was harmful to the fact that he never learned to be friends with the Hollywood system, and therefore always removed contrary to. Here is his penultimate picture, "Ghosts of Mars" , was born in hellish agony. The Snayk Plisin, conceived as the continuation of the story, by the will of the producers, the tape turned into a platform for the promotion of the rapper Ice Kyube, moreover, with the budget, half as much planned. But Carpenter was already going to retire, and therefore just scored on his own brainchild.
Of course, you can consider the “ghosts of Mars” as a kind of parody of fantastic militants: intentionally bad cinema with caricatured heroes, disgusting dialogs and direct, like a stick, plot. However, even this approach does not make the film less dull. Neither young Jason Steet, nor the beauty Natasha Hensstidge, or the colorful villain, like Marilyn Manson, do not save him. After such a movie, it's really time to rest.
5th place – “Witches” by Robert Zemkykis
At the end of the last century, Robert Zemeckis issued a hit for a hit. "Back to the future" , “Who set up Roger's rabbit?" , "Forrest Gump" , "Outcast" – All this is a classic, not a drop of the past years. And then the director without memory fell in love with computer graphics and hit strange experiments. "Polar express" , "Beowulf" And "Christmas History" They were impressive at the time of the premiere, but now it is hard to watch them: the effect of the “sinister valley” is too strongly strong. But perhaps the lowest point in the career of Zemkykis became recent "Witches" – They are out of exiting day.
The new film adaptation of the story of Roald Dahl (and at the same time rethinking the 1989 picture) suffers from all the same, for which modern remakes usually criticize. She very lazily and superficially retells the plot of the original, completely misses everything that made it special, and inventive special effects and makeup replaces with nasty graphics. As a result, a creepy, but instructive fairy tale turned into a sparkle children's comedy. The only decoration of the new “witches” is Anne Hathaway, who enchantically replay. But this is a spectacle exclusively for connoisseurs.
4th place – "Directed" Guy Richi
Guy Richie definitely does not need a long performance. Last year, a lot of noise was made "Gentlemen" , this was a little quieter "Human anger" , And his early works, "Cards, money, two trunks" And "Big Kush" , and generally diverged in quotes for a long time. Of course, there are also enough gaps in the career of the British – take at least "King Arthur's sword" , – But none of them can compare with "Directed".
Why, in general, the master of criminal comedies undertook to shoot a remake of the Italian melodrama of the seventies? Of course, because of love. The picture was created exclusively by the will of the Madonna, the director of the director at that time. She played the main role in the film, for which she received the Golden Raspberry. Richie himself went to the anti -wagon as a worst director, and “Directed” was recognized as the worst remake, a ribbon with a worst screen pair and the worst film of the year. And everything is deserved. In this, so, to say, the melodrama, the most toxic relationships are exhibited by the ideal of romance, and mutual rudeness and assault of heroes are shown as another form of flirting. Monitor such characters as long as an hour and a half is just painful.
It is not surprising that after a kind of stupidity, Richie went to shoot almost Lynchevsky "Revolver" -We must maintain at least some balance.
3rd place – "Artemis Faul" Kennet
Many know Kennet Bran in the role of the Russian oligarch in "The argument" or professor Locons in the second Harry Potter ". However, he is not only a charismatic actor, but also a talented director with a rich track record. His "Henry V" changed the idea of how to make battles in historical films, and "Murder in the Eastern Express" The works of Agatha Christie have returned popularity. Well, a four -hour "Hamlet" still remains the most meticulous film adaptation of the famous play. Alas, having coped with Shakespeare's text, and not one, Bran could not cope with the teenage fantasy Jon Kolfer: the film adaptation of the cycle about the Board-Board of Artemis Faul has become one of the main cinema-catastrophs of recent years.
The main role was approved by the young Irishman Ferdi Show, for whom the picture became a debut in the cinema. Typically, beginners do not try to put it to the fore, especially when it comes to children. AND "Artemis Faul" reminds why it happened. The show now replays, then does not bother and does not even get close into the book image of a genius-sociopath. The plot and the Kolfer universe also does not honor. In the presence of a whole world of fabulous creatures, the whole action takes place in one not too bright location. And in general, the tape gives the impression of a one and a half hour prologue to the present “Artemis Faul”, which, unfortunately, does not exist.
It is not surprising that, having received a decent pretext in the form of quarantine, Disney Without unnecessary fluctuations, I threw the tape immediately on a stream service. So at least it was possible to avoid shame in the box office. Well, Bran can only hope that the future "Death on the Nile" Pouring a hole on his reputation.
2nd place – "cats" of Tom Huper
The career of the British Tom Huper went uphill. First, he had a couple of historical mini-series, sneaking up by critics, then an Oscar-winning drama “The king says!" , After – a monumental musical "Outcast" , to the eyeballs clogged with stars. And even manipulative "Girl from Denmark" came to the taste of film academics. Everything went so good. But then the director wanted to film the show beloved from childhood: "Cats" Andrew Lloyd Webber. The rest, as they say, is already a story.
The whole Internet laughed over the first teaser of the film. Some remembered the same disgusting "Cat" with Mike Myers, others just riveted memes. But everyone converged in one: it is impossible to release this on the screens. On the eve of the premiere, Kheper told reporters that the feedback was very useful and for six months the team, of course, made heroes more pretty. Lie. But ugly woolen mutants problems "Cats" , Alas, they are not limited. This is simply a very dull and delayed film. The original musical conquered the audience not with a plot, but with bright dance numbers and energy actors. When transferring to the screen, both of the other evaporated. There was a two -hour clip capable of lulling and presenting nightmares.
1st place – "children of 4D spies" Robert Rodriguez
The filmography of Robert Rodriguez can be clearly divided into two categories: Zaliychitsky militants with ultranasilia and colorful fairy tales. Both have like masterpieces (for example, "From sunset to dawn" And "Children of Spies" ), so the failures. Among the meat grinder at the bottom is unambiguously meaningless and merciless "Machete kills". But even he half is not as bad as the lower point in the fabulous cycle of Rodriguez – "Children of Spies 4D". Because only an unsuccessful children's comedy can be worse than an unsuccessful trash.
Rodriguez without any help, on his own initiative, defiled his own franchise, ruining everything that was good in it. The first part of the critics praised just for entertaining both young and adult spectators, without resorting to buffoonery and toilet humor. And in the fourth "children of spies", almost all jokes revolve around vomiting, gases and diapers. Moreover, when the film was at the box office, the audience was invited to smell it all through special aroma cards. Actually, from here and 4D in the name. This is respect for the audience.
Well, in everything else, the new “children of spies” is just the worst version of the old “children of spies” and the most disgusting product of the creative crisis of Robert Rodriguez. Fortunately, judging by "Alit" And "Mandalor" , he is slowly getting out of him.
And what films do you think the most unsuccessful directors? Maybe you categorically don't like "Argument" Nolan? Or shakes from "Army of the Dead" Zach Snyder? Write in the comments!
- Played on Enced: A Sci-Fi Post-Apocalyptic RPG. "Fallout" on the side of the road
- Than Cool Metroid series? We analyze all parts
- Played in Vampire: The Masquarade – Bloodhunt. Impressions of closed alpha test